Brent D. Stamps, Attorney at Law consumers have reported over 10 official complaints. Out of the 10 consumer complaints against Brent D. Stamps, Attorney at Law, 10% were disputed by the consumer (i.e. the consumer was not happy with how Brent D. Stamps, Attorney at Law responded to their complaint) and 100% were processed in a timely manner. 0% of consumer complaints against Brent D. Stamps, Attorney at Law resulted in the consumer receiving monetary compensation (e.g. money, cash reimbursement, etc.) and 100% resulted in non-monetary compensation.
| Issue | Complaints | Disputed |
|---|---|---|
| Communication tactics | 6 | 0% |
| Disclosure verification of debt | 2 | 0% |
| False statements or representation | 1 | 100% |
| Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed | 1 | 0% |
Submit a complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau today
File ComplaintStop harassing phone calls, know your rights and what you can do to stop them
Stop CallsBrent D. Stamps, Attorney at Law Debt collection false statements or representation attempted to collect wrong amount June 9, 2015 - I completed admission paperwork at - Hospital and was pre-authorized for - by my insurance company. At this time, I was told specifically by the admission representative at the hospital after asking several times that I had to pay a $100.00 co-payment per my insurance company. This amount was paid and I got the impression that I could not have - unless it was satisfied. I wrote on the admission paperwork paid in full that the hospital kept. Months later, I was contacted by an attorney, Brent Stamps demanding that I pay $640.00 to the - hospital. It was somewhat confusing to me ... |
Brent D. Stamps, Attorney at Law Debt collection disclosure verification of debt not given enough info to verify debt March 26, 2015 - Phone call was received, the medical debt collection agency identified themself as a law firm. No statement regarding this debt has been received and when asked for information he said he would forward it to the attorney. He continued to say this when asked for more information regarding this debt. And he said this - times. He spoke to a spouse regarding this debt, which without prior authorization from me, the patient, I feel is a violation of -. The caller was hostile, threatening and vague. When explained that there was no difficulty in paying the debt once we had received verificatio... |