Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM) Loan modification,collection,foreclosure
Fay Servicing, LLC Mortgage department,
Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM) Loan modification,collection,foreclosure California
I applied for HAMP with Fay Servicing , LLC -. -, -, IL - and was denied a loan modification. I appealed because I was told by my file manager ( I think his name was ( - ) at Fay Servicing that I would be denied because the investor would probably require - upfront for me to qualify. He insinuated there was no reason to send the required information because I would be denied anyway based on this fact. Therefore, on -/-/15, I sent an appeal letter to Fay servicing because I would later find out it was potentially illegal in California for the Servicing Company or investor to require an upfront fee for the HAMP program. I also appealed because I had a change in circumstances. I called Fay Servicing on -/-/15 because I never heard anything back from Fay Servicing regarding the appeal. This was when I was told that my account manager was no longer there and had been assigned a new account manager named
- - '' told me that Fay Servicing could not longer communicate with me about anything to do with my loan or appeal or loan modification unless I provided them the following information:1. A letterhead from the law firm representing me in a lawsuit with - - - which has nothing to do with Fay Servicing. 2. An attorney letterhead from the attorney representing me in a BK. 3. Stated that the attorney representing me in a BK must sign the permission slip for them to talk to me about the HAMP loan modification for Fay Servicing to talk to me about my status on the loan modification appeal. Therefore - with the above being understood - I am submitting this complaint based on the following:1. Whatever BK that was filed in the past should have nothing to do with the loan modification process. This is especially considering that Fay Servicing has been communicating with me for several months during the loan modification process. This substantiates the fact that Fay Servicing potentially just made up this policy all the sudden to potentially harass me and violate my rights to appeal the loan mod process. 2. Fay Servicing is guilty of dual tracking. That is because I had sales dates every single month during the loan mod process and even have - this month during the appeal Fay Servicing absolutely refuses to talk to me about. Please help! Respectfully, - -
Fay Servicing, LLC customer in California
Oct 09, 2015
* Source: CFPB Complaint Database
Fay Servicing, LLC response to complaint:
Closed with explanation
Submit a complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau today
File ComplaintLoading similar complaints
{{x.COMPANY}} {{x.ISSUE}} {{X.SUB_ISSUE}} {{x.COMPLAINT_WHAT_HAPPENED | preview}}... |