Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC Mortgage Complaint

Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC Mortgage department,

Conventional fixed mortgage Loan modification,collection,foreclosure Pennsylvania

I have been victimized, - by a toxic mortgage loan and now by a toxic foreclosure process in which the courts seem complicit. I feel like a poster child for - - - A FIGHTING CHANCE. - - confiscated the remainder of an insurance payout after stonewalling my requests for payments for work done in accordance with the insurance adjusters estimates. Not only did they compromise my contractor, an independent adjuster whose funds were released only after he threatened to place a lien on my property, but they also precluded me from the right to appeal for funds to complete work on my property by demanding repetitive forms, letters, notarizations and an endless bureaucracy of paper work. They chose to release only the amount sufficient to pay the adjuster 's fee so that he would not place a lien, then they confiscated the remaining funds. My understanding was that they would apply them to my mortgage for approximately - payments. Instead the chose to apply the money to the back-end principal, foreclosing on my property immediately upon a thirty-day default in - before I even realized I was in arrears. I had no way of making my property whole out


foreclosuregate. '' I sought Legal Aid when Debt Collector/Foreclosure - law firm - - filed the foreclosure in the name of - - Bank - I was told that because of Sequester no funds were available. I was advised as to how to fight the foreclosure by filing an Answer. I followed the Agency 's instructions meticulously, and filed the Answer. When my foreclosure was scheduled for a hearing I again applied to Legal Aid for help, only to be told that they then could not help because I had already filed arguments on my own and that neither Legal Aid nor any other lawyer would want to follow on the foundation I had laid - '' catch -! '' Foreclosure -, Debt Collection firm, - - - pursued the foreclosure on behalf of - - until -/-/-, when - - sold my mortgage to - Bank - as of. At the hearing of -/-/-, before - Courthouse, - County PA, Debt Collector - - - - - continued their representation, but then listing the Plaintiff as - Bank - - Bank -. as Trustee for - -. The judge rejected my request for an - - ) because they did not want to inconvenience their roving robo-testifier '' who had already booked a flight from -, T-, - - -, Vice President of Legal Documentation for Rushmore Loan Management Services. It is understandable that - - was a bit confused as to documentation, after all his complany had owned my loan for barely six months at the time of his testimony. He answered Foreclosure Mill 's lawyer - - by attesting to how he travels all over the country in his VP of Legal Documentation to testify. The judge expressed sympathy for his schedule. I challenged - - testimony that Rushmore had placed my Homeowner 's Insurance, for instance. I pointed out that Rushmore had phoned my - - agent to make sure that Rushmore was on my policy, - that I have been maintaining and continue to do so for more than thirty years. In a later filing of a motion to reassess arears, the - of - in their foreclosure action, the Debt Collectors alleged that they in fact held and paid for the insurance on my property and listed it on my obligations to them - forced, double '' placement? During the continued hearing on -/-/-, I was allowed to present my side '' according to - -. He did not allow me to read the testimony I had prepared, but received the Exhibits I had prepared ( Continued under separate cover - length exceeded here )