Bleier & Cox APC consumers have reported over 6 official complaints. Out of the 6 consumer complaints against Bleier & Cox APC, 50% were disputed by the consumer (i.e. the consumer was not happy with how Bleier & Cox APC responded to their complaint) and 100% were processed in a timely manner. 0% of consumer complaints against Bleier & Cox APC resulted in the consumer receiving monetary compensation (e.g. money, cash reimbursement, etc.) and 0% resulted in non-monetary compensation.
| Issue | Complaints | Disputed |
|---|---|---|
| Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed | 3 | 67% |
| False statements or representation | 1 | 0% |
| Improper contact or sharing of info | 1 | 0% |
| Taking/threatening an illegal action | 1 | 100% |
Submit a complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau today
File ComplaintStop harassing phone calls, know your rights and what you can do to stop them
Stop CallsBleier & Cox APC Debt collection improper contact or sharing of info talked to a third party about my debt July 18, 2016 - My banking records were subpoenaed from - - -, by Bleier & Cox APC. The attorney illegally pulled records, in an effort to track down - - 's personal information, as we share an investment together. According to - court records there is no judgement against -. In fact the writ of execution has been rejected several times, with the latest being as recent as - -, -. So how were Bleier & Cox able to subpoena bank records? The original judgement was answered by - in -/-/- in - court. Since then the interest amount has allegedly grown from $380.00 to, now,... |
Bleier & Cox APC Debt collection taking/threatening an illegal action threatened to sue on too old debt June 30, 2016 - - -, - and her law firm, Cox and Bleier are attempting to sue for " legal fees '' they claim where accrued while trying to collect on a debt for plaintiff, - - ( - ). Originally, the debt went to collections in - and was bought/transferred by several different agencies and attorneys over the years. Bleier purchased/acquired the debt recently from - - - -, and is now suing for legal fees, they say were ratcheted up while representing -. - did NOT hire - -, according to the conversation I had with an - representation, soem time ago. Neither firm is... |