Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC Mortgage Complaint

Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC Mortgage department,

Other mortgage Loan modification,collection,foreclosure Washington

On or about - -, -, - - - - -, WA, posted a Notice of Default ( NOD ) on our door. We requested a mediation from the new " loan servicer '' ( - " transferred '' or " sold '' the loan to - Mortgage ). After several delays, we finally met with them - ( over a year later ). They would not do a thorough analysis of our financial ability to cover the $ - monthly mortgage, stating abruptly that they only went by our form - tax statement for income. They refused to acknowledge that a home business has greater cash flow than the tax doc will show when a large percentage of the property/home/mortgage interest is written off. Another " meeting '' was scheduled for -, but - 's representative did not even call in to the meeting. After another 6 months, in -, - -, started the foreclosure process again.


a doubt, shown our ability to resume payments. We filed suit in - of - to block a foreclosure, and were granted a - by Judge Plese of the - -, WA, court system by showing " just cause. '' The suit was filed against - - Loans ( - ), which was " merged '' with - - - - - - in -, as well as others involved, which now includes Rushmore. - attorneys remanded our case to the federal court in -. Judge - - - was assigned our case. He delayed the case from - to -, and after nearly 9 months, dismissed the case without good cause shown, denied our appeals, and finally denied our - ( b ) motion with about - words without apparently even reviewing it. We have appealed this to the - - - - - -, but Rushmore Loan Management Services and - - conspired to deprive us of our sole and only home, posting a notice on our door on or about - -, with a foreclosure date of - -, -. I have attached files showing date discrepancies on the date - took over our loan, the final - stating they took over the loan on - -, -, and posting a DOS on our door on - -, a clear violation of the 20 day rule on our requesting a mediation. Also attached are - documents supporting our allegations of " bad assignments '' that were noted in our - ( b ) motion to the Fed Court, " -, in its individual capacity and without identifying its principal, executed a false/forged assignment of deed attempting to transfer interest in the - ( Plaintiff ) loan to - - --. ( Exhibit - - attached hereto and incorporated by reference ) on - -, -. '' And again, " Defendant - claims to be an equitable assignee by assignment of deed of trust ( Plaintiff 's Exhibit - attached hereto and incorporated by reference ). The instrument relies solely upon the previous assignment instrument which has been shown to be rendered as void by operation of law. Thus, - 's claim of equitable beneficial ownership of Plaintiff 's loan obligation is rendered void by operation of same laws. '' This is the proverbial tip of the iceberg. There are forged documents within our " loan process '' and other irregularities. - has provided conflicting dates and undated allonges. If the - - - - reviews the forged instruments, irregularities, illegal actions, and bad assignments, starting with -, -, -, and now Rushmore, it is our belief that these entities will be found to have committed multiple accounts of fraud and will be fined accordingly, or worse.