Javitch, Block & Rathbone Complaint

Javitch, Block & Rathbone LLC Debt collection department,

Credit card False statements or representation Indicated shouldn't respond to lawsuit California

What the Defendant as surmised of this case and the way it was mishandled is as follows : Plaintiff and - - acquired Defendants - mailing address from credit card report, -, without prior permission and tried to use it as evidence of Defendants residency. Defendant received a summons addressed to - - -, - to appear in this Court on - -, 2014. Defendant answers the summons on - -, 2014 that stated he resides in the State of -, and would be unable to attend the hearing, due to employment obligations. Defendant receives another summons addressed to the - address to appear in Court on - -, 2014 at the request of Plaintiff, without giving an option to - 's circumstances. Plaintiff supplied numerous - - Statements and a copy of the Contract prior to - -, 2014, to the Defendant and the Court for viewing as evidence. Defendant discovered that the documents had been altered to show the appearance that the Defendant had been receiving these statements in -. Defendant has never received any Bank statement documents from - Bank at a - address. Defendant has supplied the Court with factual evidence to proof his - residency.

returned address was my -. Well the case was heard on - -, 2014, without the presence of the Defendant. The Plaintiff had prepared an Order Judgment document for the Judge to sign at the hearing, and through some persuasion his wishes were granted. Along knowing that he had won the case without having to argue against a Defendant objection. WHY WAS THIS CASE HEARD, without giving consideration to a Defendant rights to present some defense. When everyone knew the Defendant was not going to be present. What type of Dog and Pony '' show was this hearing? Defendant has submitted several requests to have this Case Vacated, based on the facts ; that ALL the evidence brought to this Court by the Plaintiff and client - - Bank is false. This was just a clever, disrespectful and unlawful attempt to try and show that the Defendant resides in -The Defendant after receiving the shocking notice of Summary Judgment several months later as it was sent to - - - -, - and then forwarded to Defendants legal residency address in -. Defendant filed a Dismissal request with the Court and the Plaintiff in - 2014 with a return address receipt showing his - address. IF the Defendant is to be held contractually obligated with the - - Card Contract and all its contents that the Plaintiff presented to the Court as evidence. If So ; then the whole contract has to be recognized, not just bits and pieces. The Plaintiff should be obligated to follow the Contract agreement under Arbitration and Hearings '' and propose a means of arbitration and possible mutual settlement. At no time during these proceedings has Arbitration been presented to the Defendant by the Plaintiff or its client - -. Violation of - - 's contract with Defendant. Plaintiff should consider their decision for Dismissal as they did in Case -, - - -. -, when it became perfectly clear that I was not a - resident, and you were filing in the wrong jurisdiction. Defendant is returning to - residence.