Encore Capital Group Debt Collection Complaint

Encore Capital Group Debt collection department,

Credit card Disclosure verification of debt Right to dispute notice not received Arizona

REF : Case No. -Midland Funding lawsuitI believe that the garnishment on my wages for a money Judgment by Midland Funding a junk debt buyer has no legal jurisdiction for their claim. Prior to a judgment granted to Midland Funding from the judicial system in the State of -, Midland never supplied documented proof of evidence supporting their right to file a lawsuit as requested. My requested information to them was : ( 1 ) Signed Copy of the agreement between me and the original creditor in -. ( 2 ) Last recorded payment date or Default date record from the original creditor. ( 3 ) Chain of Title of ownership verifying and proving that I owe Midland Funding the third party debt buyer as opposed to the original creditor giving Midland Funding the right to sue and collect on this debt outside the state of - to determine whether or not the statute of limitations had expired. Filed in the - Justice Courts, State of -, - County Consolidated Justice Courts - - -, - -, by - - - -, -, - - -. This debt was initiated prior to my getting married and thereby acquiring a new


time period and date for a statue of limitation rights of the lawsuit initiated in - whereby having jurisdiction over such matters, not - 's statute of limitations. The State of - law as it relates to perusing a debtor for a defaulted credit card account in - is ( 6 ) years. This contractual obligation was not executed in the state of - and therefore Midland Funding did not legally have a valid or enforceable lawsuit as granted. If there is a conflict between another state 's jurisdiction and this state relating to the statute of limitations for a debt action clarification is described in - Revised Statutes ( A.R.S. ) 12-548 subsection A is found here. Whether intentional or unintentional the last payout default date which Midland Funding never supplied as request to my knowledge was more than 4 years when their first lawsuit was filed and was actually an unenforceable and/or a fraudulent claim filed by Midland Funding through /in the State of - legal system illegally avoiding and/or negating the originating contractual state of - Statue of limitation laws that should have been used setting precedence of this existing lawsuit, judgment and claim. Additionally NOTE : This Lawsuit judgment granted initially for the original principal of $880.00 from its origin has escalated to now due and owing of $2900.00. This amount as claimed for garnishment is also from -/-/- to -/-/-. My estimated interest on the total judgment of $ [email protected] % per annum from the last filing should be in the vicinity of $130.00. What adjustments and/or how was the additional outstanding judgment balance now due and owing of $2900.00 calculated and derived at in the current Writ as submitted by - - -, - - - -, - -, -, -. -?