BankUnited Mortgage Complaint

BankUnited Mortgage department,

Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM) Settlement process and costs Florida

The case is centered on the bank refusal to honore our TILA rescission. For over five years we 've been fighting them in their attempts to take our home. We initially purchased our homestead property on - -, - from - - with a - mortgage and a - mortgage. We subsequently consolidated the - loans on - -, - and took a new mortgage with a different lender '' called -. On - -, -, Florida - - - - terminated - - - ( - '' ) mortgage lending license due to questionable lending activities ( Exhibit-- ). On - -, -, after discovering irregularities in our mortgage loan we rescinded our loan by notifying - and BankUnited - via certified mails with return receipt requested ( Exhibit-- ). Neither - nor BankUnited -/BankUnited


me and my wife in the Circuit Court of - -, Florida. On - -, -, BankUnited N.A, filed a motion to vacate the default final judgment of quiet title and the state court vacated the judgment. On - -, -, the FDIC, in its capacity as receiver for BankUnited - removed the case to - - Court for the - - - Florida. On - -, -, the federal court erroneously dismissed our claim of rescission. The court granted summary judgment in favor of BankUnited N.A. The - - - - - affirmed the lower court decision ( Exhibit-- ). With the money judgment BankUnited N.A. obtained a foreclosure judgment and scheduled the sale of our property. We are currently appealing that decision. BankUnited N.A with the help of the law firm of - - - and - - -. have consistently ignored our rescission and caused us to defend an illegal foreclosure for years. The Supreme Court decision in -, No. - ( U.S. - -, - ) confirmed that we properly rescinded our loan. The bank and its lawyers continue to harass and threaten us with the foreclosure of our home. We seek the help of the agency to resolve this matter once and for all.