M&T Bank Mortgage Complaint

M&T Bank Mortgage department,

Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM) Loan modification,collection,foreclosure Washington

The lender/servicer ... - - has indicated that the SOLE PLAINTIFF, Wilmington Trust is the beneficiary/investor of loan # - related to the property - - - -, - -, WA -. Counsel for the Sole Plaintiff, - - for - - - - who has filed the complaint against me in the JUDICIAL foreclosure case in Washington State CASE # - has stated in her complaint that her client, Wilmington Trust for the - - - Trust is the HOLDER of the NOTE! The Plaintiff has indicated through responses from their subsidiary, M & T Bank, that Wilmington Trust is acting in a Trustee Capacity ONLY! Please check your past records to review this very important letter from M & T Bank. They have further stated that all questions should be directed to - -, ( WHO IS NOT A PARTY TO THIS LAWSUIT ). MY COMPLAINT THROUGH YOUR OFFICE TODAY IS NOT AGAINST - - BUT SOLELY AGAINST WILMINGTON TRUST, the sole Plaintiff in the case. M & Ts past letter to your office indicates that the loan servicer is best equipped to answer questions. I expect the answers to my questions in this matter to come direct


of Wilmington Trust because they are suing me and because they are just the ACCEPTING TRUSTEE FOR THE NEW RMBS SETTLEMENT AGT. For $4.00 - Dollars, in which the - - - Trust appears to be a part of. I also ask this of WT, because the servicer, - - already attempted much deception along with HUGE misrepresentation in - when they attempted a fraudulent and illegal foreclosure action using - as the Beneficiary by and through fabricated documents ( assignments ) and fraudulent affidavits/declarations/ by - different employees of - - that both had VP titles. Their names are - - and - -. ( Both Robo signors who claimed that - was the - ). The Non Judicial - County Foreclosure Case # - resulted in both - and - - admitting on -/-/- that - has never owned my loan or been the beneficiary. This is also written in verbatim reports to the court. 1 ) Exactly WHAT DATE and HOW Did Wilmington Trust acquire the note that was discharged in Ch-- BK in -/-/- that was allegedly sold into the - - - Trust? IF WT is truly the holder of the note as their attorney - - for - - claims they are, then they should have no problem answering this question and back it up with proof. BUT NOT WITH recreated documents and various newly created POA and the like2 ) If WT is the HOLDER OF THE ALLEGED WET SIGNED NOTE, then perhaps they will put that in writing to you and issue me a valid NOD to match! There is a reason why they avoid this so they do n't have to go to -. Did - - release the note within the trust OR was it never really sold into the trust? Please provide proof that the loan is in the pool specified within the trust. Please advise whether this loan was ever tied to the - - - Trust with a - filed on that trust. 3 ) It is essential to me, the legal owner of record and homeowner for 15 years with significant investment learn the truth. For I have already been taken down the fraudulent path of deception by WF, the servicer. Instead, they affected every possible chance of getting a legal modification and proper mediation under the Wa State Foreclosure Statute, while other homeowners have these opportunities. I refuse to lose my home to entities attempting to steal our family home for the sake of unjust enrichment. The Huge Fraud of Big BANK - - Business IS NOT MY DOING!!!