JPMorgan Chase Mortgage Complaint

JPMorgan Chase Mortgage department,

Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM) Loan modification,collection,foreclosure Washington

I wish to file this complaint against EMC. EMC stated in my - court case that they never had interest in my property and were never a beneficiary. - - was with - - when this was admitted. It was also admitted by - - of -, -, -. Both - - and - - were legal counsel for - -. It was also admitted by - -, EMCs attorney. - -, general counsel for EMC and JP Morgan wrote an affidavit as well that she was not able to find this loan/property anywhere. - - said they did an extensive search. A new lawsuit has now been filed. This time it is judicial and - - is at it again. They represent the sole -, - -, but under the guise of - -. - - is their client. Anyways, they had a - witness come into court ( who failed to mention she had a - degree from - University and had practiced law in Oregon ). Anyways, she made some interesting statements and due to her education level should most definitely be held more accountable for her testimony. The - assignment made by WF on my property


own admittance that it was inaccurately recorded in the public realm and that EMC has never had interest nor a beneficiary of my property. INSTEAD they left it there to build off of it, therefore rendering every single other assignment made in -/-/- void. They show a -/-/- assignment from - - to - - and then an -/-/- assignment to EMC LLC as their attorney in fact to - -. They also altered - of the endorsements. Funny, the - - - trust requires that the note and DOT be endorsed properly. The note is absent an - endorsement. - - admitted that the endorsement on the note to - was added -/-/-. The trust has a closing date of -/-/-. There is no way this loan was effectively sold into the - - - trust. Matter of fact, - - states they are the custodian and they have documents in their custodian file that state ENDORSMENT ISSUE ( ATTORNEY NEEDS ) and also another document that states UNPOOLED. They claim it is in the - pool of - - - -. - would need to be a ncessary party if this loan was truly put into the trust, as well as timely I might add, per the specific rules of the - agt. My mortgage note was discharged in -/-/- bankruptcy, and the loan was not re-affirmed. - - had a non-negotiable instrument. However, I paid approx. $ - in payments direct to - - in good faith, despite no longer being an obligor on the note, and since I had not paid off the loan. IN GOOD FAITH. - - tried to get me to sign a loan modification in -/-/- that had ridiculous errors that they tried to pass off as a computer glitch. They raised the interest rate which raised the payment, all during our hardship. - - said had we signed the loan modification, EMC would have honored it. This statement alone ( although hearsay, but it was said ), tells me the loan could not possibly be in the trust for starters. - - 's witness - - claimed that - has held the note and DOT the entire time, which is another reason why I do not believe the loan was put into the trust. I am not sure how - - could have LEGALLY negotiated a note that was no longer a negotiable instrument due to it being discharged in chapter - BK in -/-/- and not being re-affirmed. - - has been creating new documents or fabricating documents such as these - - sheets that they expect me to believe. Tired of the -!