Bank of America Mortgage Complaint

Bank of America Mortgage department,

Other mortgage Loan servicing, payments, escrow account California

Bank of America 's CEO, President, Attorney - has the background of our - rooted mortgage - situation, involving IRS estate tax time window whereby, millions were lost needlessly, affecting BofA mortgage -, its collateral, -, -, not intended to be sold, if Winchester commercial realtors performed as hired. DOUBLE DIP - BofA, by involving smaller lenders, rewinds the mortgage clock, to day one. My siblings and I, through our parents ' estate have already, since -, paid in approximately $ - in lump and other payments, to -. This is $ - out of about a $ - or thereabouts purchase price. Compassion and humanitarian perspective needs to be heightened, as I have - siblings, approaching senior years, who have lived life with -, believed to have been due to exposure to DDT as infants, in agricultural area. THIS -. HOUSE WITH OTHER PROPERTIES ARE OUR BACKUP PLAN TO WELL-BEING. GRATEFUL FOR


PLEASE ASSURE BOFA UNDERSTANDS, we can not afford " double dip, '' as after paying in approximately $ -, another $ -, rewinding the mortgage to day one, would have a house worth about $ - on the market today, THEORETICALLY COST ABOUT $ -! THIS SHOULD BE A VIOLATION IF ANY BANK CHARGES DOUBLE FOR A HOUSE, IN REALITY FIGURES. In -, BANK OF AMERICA SETTLED $ - IN MORTGAGE VIOLATIONS, WITH CONSUMERS. MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE SAME OPPORTUNITY THROUGH USDJ/BofA Stipulated Settlement on -. I wish for BofA to understand that my family and family estate can not be victims to smaller lenders. We need to work with BofA exclusively and inclusively, as it has the best online banking services and best long term customer service for business and personal. Above all, we can not afford double dip into our mortgage payment plan, where a house begins its price tag at $ - or thereabouts, there are payouts close to $ - with improvements, then, a smaller servicing lender, BofA hands the loan off to, rewinds the mortgage to $ -, day one -, figures. THEORETICALLY, BECAUSE OF INTEREST, THIS CAN END UP MORE THAN DOUBLE DIP, as just taking payout approximate amount with improvements being close to $ -, adding the rewind $ - - figure, Equals about $ - - possible unjust impoverishment case for any homeowner, especially, if house markets in -, at $ -. LARGER BANKS HANDING OFF LOANS TO SMALLER LOAN SERVICING PROVIDERS : SMALLER LENDER HANDOFF GOUGE SHOULD BECOME A CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW, INCORPORATED INTO HOMEOWNER BILL OF RIGHTS LAWS - LIKE CALIFORNIA 'S -. LEGAL SAFEGUARDS TO PROTECT AGAINST UNJUST IMPOVERISHMENT OF HOMEOWNERS.