Credit reporting company's investigation no notice of investigation status/result
TransUnion Credit reporting department,
Credit reporting company's investigation No notice of investigation status/result California
On -/-/- I disputed - accounts as inaccurate/incomplete with specificity as to what wasinaccurate/ incomplete.on -/-/- the investigation was completed with '' new information '' ( documents - & - ) .Both accounts are delinquent charge-offs and do not supply the basic '' date of first delinquency '', as required by FCRA.BOTH do not include the amount of lastpayment and other incomplete inaccurate info. ( documents - - ) .The creditors do not specify these items to completely report because it would then be calculable that both creditors charged penalty fees in excess of those allowable by the -/-/- CREDIT CARD ACTwhich was fully implemented just prior to the opening of both accounts.I believe both creditors do not want to be paid ... ..because in writing off excessive illegal fees they make more moneythan if I would pay only the charges allowed by law ... ..so they earn more defrauding the tax authorities and the public.TRANSUNION should have deleted both accounts but they do notbecause the creditors are their customers and pay them to collude.TRANSUNION ISNOT ALLOWED TO REPORT INCOMPLETE /INACCURATE INFORMATION afterinvestigation, especially obvious, on the face of the record items.
TransUnion customer in California
Oct 24, 2015
* Source: CFPB Complaint Database
TransUnion response to complaint:
Closed with explanation
Submit a complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau today
File ComplaintLoading similar complaints
{{x.COMPANY}} {{x.ISSUE}} {{X.SUB_ISSUE}} {{x.COMPLAINT_WHAT_HAPPENED | preview}}... |