Citibank Mortgage Complaint

Citibank Mortgage department,

Other mortgage Loan servicing, payments, escrow account Florida

In - of - we received a decision from the - Court of Appeals regarding a lawsuit we had filed against CitiMortgage in -. Upon reviewing the Appeal court decision we discovered that CitiMortgage and their counsel- introduced fraudulent and deceptive evidence into their - brief ( Addendum Volume - Part - pages - ) that was not present in the trial court. This action amounts to fraud, falsification of public records, mortgage fraud as well as criminal fraud. The evidence CitiMortgage and counsel introduced into the Appeal Court record was an Affidavit by CitiMortgage employee ( alleged - - -. - Affidavit now proffered a copy of our mortgage note with the addition of a - page that contained an endorsement that was never presented during the trial court. In fact, in all prior court filings and county records, as well as - Affidavit that was - presented in CitiMortgage 's Motion for Summary Judgment on - -, - ; the mortgage note contained only - pages and had no endorsements. Interestingly, in the same Appeal Addendum ( Volume - Part - pages - ) Citimortgage presents a - page note with no endorsement in direct conflict with the


60 of - Civil Procedure. Under - Civil Procedure Rule 60, amended paragraph ( 4 ) of subdivision - c ) states a judgment, decree or order may be modified or set aside [ f ] or misrepresentation or fraud ( whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or extrinsic ) by an adverse party. '' The concealment or forgery of this - page with endorsement to our mortgage note is evidence of fraud among other legal violations yet to be determined. Tampering with a public record is a Class D felony and is punishable by up to six years in prison in - This fraud involves a property located in -, a borrower who lives in - and a mortgage servicer and employee that reside in -. This deception resulted in an unfair trial and potentially the loss of a home valued at over $300000.00. This is n't the - time - has perjured himself. There is a - case entitled - - - - - - and CitiMortgage, Inc. - - District Court - ), where - - declared under the penalty of perjury, that a note that was endorsed to CitiMortgage came directly from the loan originator. Despite - sworn testimony, CitiMortgage later admitted judicially that the assignment of - note from MERS was a fabrication. Note : Although I am not certain that - - - who use aliases - - and - - - is the same individual, - year-old - - from - was recently arrested for - and other charges. My dealings with Citimortgage have been rife with fraud over the past decade. Not only did Citimortgage file - fraudulent proof of claims in - Federal bankruptcy proceedings, but revoked an 'approved repayment plan ' when we were in compliance with the agreement. There are a myriad of other issues involving Citimortgage including standing and other fraudulent acts, but this latest illegal maneuver has resulted in a violation of due process and prejudiced the court 's decision. Thank you.