BWW Law Group, LLC Debt Collection Complaint

BWW Law Group, LLC Debt collection department,

Mortgage False statements or representation Attempted to collect wrong amount Maryland

Law Firm Must Pay $ - For Operating Automated Debt-Collection ... - ... Consumerist - -, - - In - -, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau sued - - - - - - a law firm that specializes exclusively in debt ... emailed to cfpb ombudsman team - / - fraud mortgage assignment robo signer around the county filing of shady assignments.


2. Representation was untrue. 3. Party making the representation knew it was untrue. 4. Representation was made with the intent to deceive and for the purpose of inducing the recipient to act upon it.5. Recipient justifiably relied on the representation. 6. By relying on the untrue statement, the recipient suffered damages.1 1. A false representation was made, usually one of fact. 2. Party making the representation had knowledge or belief that the representation was false, or made the representation with the requisite indifference to the truth. 3. Representation was made with the intent to induce the recipient to act, or refrain from acting. 4. Recipient acted or did not act in justifiable reliance on the representation.5. Recipient suffered damages - a result. D. Misconduct in Other States 1. Maryland and Virginia While Florida and New York provided much of the news for reports on attorney misconduct, other states ' attorneys managed to earn negative attention as well.Foreclosure law firms in Maryland and Virginia admitted to committing serious misconduct. Attorneys at - and at - admitted that other attorneys had signed their signatures in documents submitted to court.- Several notaries had their licenses revoked and the Maryland Court - - adopted a rule allowing courts to appoint independent attorneys to review foreclosure documents for irregularities.- Meanwhile, at the Virginia firm of - , attorneys admitted to the same practices, supposedly to avoid the " sloppy '' practice of crossing out another attorney 's name below a signature line.- Show cause hearings were held in several Maryland counties regarding the issu t another headline-making Florida firm being investigated by the Florida Attorney General , an attorney at the Law Offices of - - - said she handled between - and - - files at any given time.- Further, the attorney testified that it was common practice to sign documents without notaries present, and then to allow notaries to stamp those documents later as if they had been signed in front of a notary.- As with -, rumors circulated that - - signed documents without reviewing them.- After - - stopped referring cases to the firm,- the firm paid $2.00 - to settle the attorney general 's investigation, making it the only high volume foreclosure firm in Florida to settle.- The foreclosure mill, -, has been shut down after the owner, - -, pled guilty to unlawful and unethical practices at his firm. D. Misconduct in Other States 1. Maryland and Virginia While Florida and New York provided much of the news for reports on attorney misconduct, other states ' attorneys managed to earn negative attention as well. Foreclosure law firms in Maryland and Virginia admitted to committing serious misconduct. Attorneys at - and at -, - admitted that other attorneys had signed their signatures in documents submitted to court.- Several notaries had their licenses revoked and the Maryland Court of - adopted a rule allowing courts to appoint independent attorneys to review foreclosure documents for irregularities.- Meanwhile, at the Virginia firm of -